I’ve only skimmed the article as it seems to be fairly standard fare. No disrespect but not much new information BUT worth reading. Here’s the thing… if there is a nuclear exchange the end result will be at a minimum 5B+ dead within the first year. Another 2B+ will be dead within 18 months due to starvation. The remaining 1B will survive…
I’ve only skimmed the article as it seems to be fairly standard fare. No disrespect but not much new information BUT worth reading. Here’s the thing… if there is a nuclear exchange the end result will be at a minimum 5B+ dead within the first year. Another 2B+ will be dead within 18 months due to starvation. The remaining 1B will survive provided they have 6-10 years worth of food - which is how long the nuclear winter will last. The world at the other end will be a far cry from what we have today. Methinks 1700s if we’re lucky. Otherwise we’ll just muddle along indefinitely IMHO. Pax
I’ve only skimmed the article as it seems to be fairly standard fare. No disrespect but not much new information BUT worth reading. Here’s the thing… if there is a nuclear exchange the end result will be at a minimum 5B+ dead within the first year. Another 2B+ will be dead within 18 months due to starvation. The remaining 1B will survive provided they have 6-10 years worth of food - which is how long the nuclear winter will last. The world at the other end will be a far cry from what we have today. Methinks 1700s if we’re lucky. Otherwise we’ll just muddle along indefinitely IMHO. Pax