Alex, this is absolutely fascinating -- both for itself, and for what you say of all the other Civil Defense documents. You describe the graph as "a tool to think with", which leads me to wonder about what kind of thoughts all the other non-honest CD documents led to.
Also, a few typos here and there are slipping through and impeding your…
Alex, this is absolutely fascinating -- both for itself, and for what you say of all the other Civil Defense documents. You describe the graph as "a tool to think with", which leads me to wonder about what kind of thoughts all the other non-honest CD documents led to.
Also, a few typos here and there are slipping through and impeding your meaning (particularly in the first quoted paragraph). Some content creators allow early access to some subscribers for review and corrections. Just a thought!
For whatever reason, the PDF I have of this particular document is doing a weird thing where it is doubling up words and sentences in an apparently random fashion. I caught most of it... but apparently not all of it!
Alex, this is absolutely fascinating -- both for itself, and for what you say of all the other Civil Defense documents. You describe the graph as "a tool to think with", which leads me to wonder about what kind of thoughts all the other non-honest CD documents led to.
Also, a few typos here and there are slipping through and impeding your meaning (particularly in the first quoted paragraph). Some content creators allow early access to some subscribers for review and corrections. Just a thought!
For whatever reason, the PDF I have of this particular document is doing a weird thing where it is doubling up words and sentences in an apparently random fashion. I caught most of it... but apparently not all of it!